A research workspace for scholarly work
For authors who actually
read the sources.
Ask a research question and get real data, theoretical lineages, historical precedents, and counter-arguments — every citation verified. Then write, annotate, cite, and export your manuscript, all in one workspace.
Research Query
Waiting…
Waiting…
Waiting…
Waiting…
Synthesized Research Brief
Key Finding: Both Japan and the US deployed QE as unconventional monetary policy, but divergent outcomes…
Empirical Evidence
Japan’s QE (2001–2006, expanded 2013) expanded the BOJ balance sheet by 350%, yet inflation…
Counter-Arguments
Critics note that QE disproportionately inflated asset prices, widening wealth inequality…
The workflow
You lead. The agents do the legwork.
You set the framing and the sources that matter. The agents then fetch the data, trace the literature, and surface counter-evidence — in parallel, always from real sources you can check. The questions, the lens, and the final call stay yours.
Set the project focus
Name your discipline, the theories and thinkers that matter, your critical lens, the period and regions in play for cohesive context throughout.
Ask your research questions
In plain language or specialist terms, broad ideas or niche scopes. “How did QE outcomes diverge between Japan and the US?” works just fine.
Agents run on your intuition
Point them at your library and they build on the sources you’ve already gathered and the notes you’ve annotated, not just the open web.
You decide what holds
A synthesized brief with every claim cited and counter-arguments flagged. You weigh the evidence and make the call, the judgment stays yours.
The four specialists
Pulls GDP, inflation, employment numbers from FRED, World Bank, IMF, and more.
Searches Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, CrossRef, and arXiv for relevant frameworks and debates.
Digs through Internet Archive, Library of Congress, and academic databases for precedents.
Looks for what contradicts your thesis — methodological gaps, rival findings, things you might miss.
The workspace
Everything in one place.
Research, annotate, write, and collaborate without switching tabs. Your sources, notes, and drafts stay connected.
Research output
Briefs and bibliographies, automatically
Every research session gives you a structured brief with an executive summary and an annotated bibliography — tagged by chapter, searchable later. An agent log shows you exactly how the findings were gathered.
Key Finding: Divergent QE outcomes…
Empirical Evidence: BOJ expanded…
Policy Implications: Central banks…
Annotation
Read and annotate in the same place
Highlight a passage, attach a note, run source criticism on a PDF — provenance, reliability, bias — without switching apps.
The effectiveness of large-scale asset purchases depends critically on monetary transmission mechanisms which operate through the portfolio rebalancing effect.
Under liquidity trap conditions, conventional policy tools lose traction.
Compare with Friedman’s channel theory
Peer review
Catch the gaps before your reviewers do
Run a peer-review simulation on any chapter. It flags weak arguments, missing evidence, and methodological concerns so you can fix them before submission.
The causal link between QE and employment needs stronger evidence. Consider adding the Blinder (2010) counterfactual analysis.
Selection bias concern: Japan and US cases aren’t directly comparable without controlling for demographic differences.
Strong use of primary BOJ transcripts. Consider adding Eurozone ECB data as a third comparison point.
Collaboration
Stop emailing drafts
Co-authors and advisors edit the same document at the same time. Real-time cursors, threaded comments, role-based permissions. One version of the truth.
The divergence in QE outcomes between Japan and the United States reveals fundamental differences in how monetary transmission operates across institutional contexts.
Bernanke’s approach prioritized signaling effects, while the BOJ focused on direct balance sheet expansion.
This distinction matters because
Dr. Patel: Should we cite Koo (2008) on balance sheet recessions here?
You: Good call — adding it now.
Writing
Write where you research
Footnotes, citations, track changes — a real manuscript editor. No more copying findings into Word and fixing the formatting for an hour.
The Japanese experience with quantitative easing provides a crucial counterfactual for evaluating the Federal Reserve’s response to the 2008 crisis.
1 Bernanke argues that the scale of intervention…
Argument mapping
Map your argument visually
See how your claims, evidence, and counter-arguments actually connect. Spot the gaps in the structure, not just the prose.
You do the thinking. Husearch does the legwork.
This isn’t a chatbot that writes your paper. It’s a research tool that goes and finds what you’d find yourself — the data, the precedents, the counter-arguments — just faster. Every judgment call is still yours.
You set the direction
You decide what to investigate, which sources matter, and when to stop.
You check the sources
Every claim links to a real paper or dataset. Nothing is taken on faith.
You write the paper
The brief is raw material. The argument, the framing, the voice — that’s yours.
FAQ
Common questions.
How is this different from asking ChatGPT to do my research?
The agents call live academic and data APIs — Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, CrossRef, arXiv, FRED, the World Bank, Internet Archive, the Library of Congress — so findings trace back to real papers and datasets, not a model’s recollection. A dedicated Critic agent actively hunts for counter-evidence, and the synthesizer flags contradictions rather than smoothing them over.
Where do citations come from, and how do you avoid fabricated sources?
Every cited claim links to a record returned by a real source API, and references are verified against CrossRef in the background. When a source can’t be resolved it’s surfaced, never invented — and an agent log shows you exactly which databases each agent searched.
Can I import my Zotero library?
Yes. Husearch reads CSL-JSON, BibTeX, and RIS, so a Zotero (or Mendeley, or EndNote) export drops straight into your citation manager and is reusable across every chapter.
Who owns my drafts and notes? Is my work used to train models?
Your work is yours. We don’t train models on your projects, drafts, or notes. Everything is stored in your account, organized by project and chapter, and exportable whenever you want it.
Can I export to LaTeX or Word for my publisher?
Yes — export a chapter or a full manuscript to .docx or print-ready PDF, or generate LaTeX for a journal template. Footnotes, citations, and formatting come along with it.
Does it work offline?
The workspace is a progressive web app, so your drafts and recent sessions stay readable and editable offline. New research runs — which call external APIs — pick back up once you’re reconnected.
What disciplines is it built for?
The humanities and social sciences. A per-project Research Focus tells the agents your discipline, regions, time period, key thinkers, and critical lens, so results are steered to your field instead of staying generic.
Start the book you’ve been putting off.
Early access. Built for researchers who’d rather think than search.